Users with the Lowest Id Numbers.

Category: Zone BBS Q&A

Post 1 by peanut_butter_junkie (Veteran Zoner) on Wednesday, 02-Sep-2009 7:37:48

I'm wondering who's been on the Zone the longest and who has the lowest user numbers.

Post 2 by Brooke (I just keep on posting!) on Wednesday, 02-Sep-2009 9:53:41

Other than the admin, the lowest I've seen are Chris N (#26), and Goldfingas (#35).

Post 3 by laced-unlaced (Account disabled) on Wednesday, 02-Sep-2009 10:04:22

the lowest i've seen actually online (excluding users 1 and 2) are:

user number 3

jammin jerry (5)

curious liam (16)

Post 4 by Shadow_Cat (I've now got the silver prolific poster award! wahoo!) on Wednesday, 02-Sep-2009 10:33:43

Go to the user profiles section, have it sort by user ID starting with the lowest number, and see how many you recognize. Smile.

Post 5 by SingerOfSongs (Heresy and apostasy is how progress is made.) on Wednesday, 02-Sep-2009 11:19:39

It is kind of interesting to see which ones of the older members are still here.

Post 6 by peanut_butter_junkie (Veteran Zoner) on Wednesday, 02-Sep-2009 15:20:53

I wonder how long the zone has been up?

Post 7 by laced-unlaced (Account disabled) on Wednesday, 02-Sep-2009 15:32:23

the zone's been up since the end of january 2003

Post 8 by robbiec12345 (Good night and Farewell ) on Friday, 04-Sep-2009 4:14:37

One question which i've been curious to find out the answer too: What happened to user 15? That user doesn't appear to exist (though i've seen a couple of posts made by user 15 in the graffiti archives back in 2003).

Post 9 by laced-unlaced (Account disabled) on Friday, 04-Sep-2009 4:25:20

lol, i want to know too. i also want to know why in some profiles it says that they have logged in in 1969, and the site was not even around!

Post 10 by robbiec12345 (Good night and Farewell ) on Saturday, 12-Sep-2009 11:14:45

hmm, I noticed that once but didn't report it in the end. I think there must have been a load of glitches with the site back in 2003-2004.

Post 11 by laced-unlaced (Account disabled) on Saturday, 12-Sep-2009 14:19:53

probably right, and cos the users never logged in, the profiles just stayed like that